![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#61 (permalink) | |
|
:::Official Spammer:::
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,036
|
Quote:
__________________
03 ltz400,95.5bore,+5crank,P&P,13.7:1,JE piston,spacer plate,RHC +1 intakes valves,RHC #208in&187ex cams,DRZ manual decomp,DID cam chain,no air box,Sredrum TB 42mm FCR,RAT stack,WB fuel screw,EMN needle,quick shot,06 clutch 450r drive plates w/trx400 ex springs,C2HB,ex thumber,trx450r air boot, Barker Performance pipe, trailteck flywheel,dynatek,nerf bars,450r shocks, nerf bars,+4 swinger,lowered front & rear |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#62 (permalink) |
|
:::Rookie Rider:::
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
|
i had the box moved back with the stock H2C boot and the EX boot was to long and i had already cut some off, it seemed that if i had cut back any more i would be increasing the diameter. so then i put the DRZ-e H2C boot on and the stock intake boot but this seemed to make the stock boot almost to short and the angle of the carb was off and i had to modify the head stay. but with the spare H2C boot from my 525XC it clears the head stay with room for the hot start cable if you choose to use one, the angle is good and the stock intake boot fits great with the air box in stock location. all in all IMHO any performance gains that i would gain in useing the EX boot could be more than made up if i lost five pounds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 (permalink) |
|
:::LT250 Rider:::
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 803
|
ive heard good things about the 400ex boot. and i dont think youd see any gain in a loss of 5 lbs lol..but i see your point
__________________
2003 Suzuki Ltz 400 -got some stuff 2000 Honda XR50 - pitbike 2006 Nissan SE-R Spec-v - daily driver 1993 Jeep Wrangler - built and swapped |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|